Post by account_disabled on Dec 31, 2023 21:32:40 GMT -8
Afree choice of profession which is always conditioned by compliance with the legal requirements inherent in the profession. . Since the presented arguments do not result in a restriction of the fundamental right provided for by art. of the Constitution . The court cannot retain the incidence in question of the provisions of art. of the Constitution . . For the reasons stated above pursuant to art. lit. d and of art. para. of the Constitution as well as of art. of art. paragraph lit. Ad and of art. of Law no. . by unanimous vote CONSTITUTIONAL COURT In the name of the law DECIDE Rejects as unfounded the exception of unconstitutionality raised by.
Monica Tudorancea in File no. of the Ploieti Court of Appeal Country Email List Section II civil administrative and fiscal litigation and finds that the provisions of art. para. lit. f and para. from the Law of notaries public and notarial activity no. are constitutional in relation to the criticisms formulated. Definitive and generally binding. The decision is communicated to the Ploiesti Court of Appeal Section II civil administrative and fiscal litigation and is published in the Official Gazette of Romania Part I. Pronounced in the meeting of November . THE PRESIDENT OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL.
COURT university professor Dr. VALER DORNEANU Assistant Chief Magistrate Mihaela Senia Costinescu DECISION No. of September regarding the exception of unconstitutionality of the provisions of art. para. and art. para. of the Civil Procedure Code Official Gazette minutes Official Gazette January DECISION No. of September regarding the exception of unconstitutionality of the provisions of art. para. and art. para. of the Civil Procedure Code Issuer CONSTITUTIONAL COURT Valer Dorneanu president Marian Enache judge Petre Lzroiu judge Mircea judge MonaMaria Pivniceru judge Livia Doina Stanciu judge SimonaMaya Teodoroiu judge Attila Varga judge Andrea Costin assistant magistrate With the.
Monica Tudorancea in File no. of the Ploieti Court of Appeal Country Email List Section II civil administrative and fiscal litigation and finds that the provisions of art. para. lit. f and para. from the Law of notaries public and notarial activity no. are constitutional in relation to the criticisms formulated. Definitive and generally binding. The decision is communicated to the Ploiesti Court of Appeal Section II civil administrative and fiscal litigation and is published in the Official Gazette of Romania Part I. Pronounced in the meeting of November . THE PRESIDENT OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL.
COURT university professor Dr. VALER DORNEANU Assistant Chief Magistrate Mihaela Senia Costinescu DECISION No. of September regarding the exception of unconstitutionality of the provisions of art. para. and art. para. of the Civil Procedure Code Official Gazette minutes Official Gazette January DECISION No. of September regarding the exception of unconstitutionality of the provisions of art. para. and art. para. of the Civil Procedure Code Issuer CONSTITUTIONAL COURT Valer Dorneanu president Marian Enache judge Petre Lzroiu judge Mircea judge MonaMaria Pivniceru judge Livia Doina Stanciu judge SimonaMaya Teodoroiu judge Attila Varga judge Andrea Costin assistant magistrate With the.